Events
Upcoming Events in the Next Week
No Events for Your Query
We're sorry but there weren't any events for your query. Please try broadening your search. Also -- this could be us -- Pollitify is just getting started and, shocking, I know, there can at times be ahem software bugs. We are also still tirelessly scouring the Internet for more sources of events. Please check back later this week when you will be able to submit your own events.
If you just want to see functionality then please try searching for Indiana as the state. We are an Indiana company and events in Indiana always seem to show up first (at least for now).
September 2025
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Suggest an Event
Want an event to appear here? Just fill the form below. A couple of notes:
- Free. Adding an event is free. Of course it is free, we are pro democracy and we believe that the more grass roots events there are, the faster we achieve our shared goal: overthrowing fascism in America.
- Mobilize. Have a mobilize url for your event? Just drop it in the field below and we will automatically add the right information.
- Fast. To prevent spam, when you add an event without having an account, we do review the event before making it live but we're striving to get events up the same day.
Thank you for adding your event. Every event, whether a protest, a rally, a march or something else takes us closer to our goals.
Team Pollitify
The protest nerds behind this software
I want to add an event by:
Pasting in the Text I was Going to Post on the Web
Uploading my Event Flier so You Can Do the Work for Me
Adding All Your Events At Once by Importing Your Google Sheet
0 | 0 | 0 |
Charlie Kirk in His Own Words![]() Black people
Black pilots
Black women
Civil rights
The death penalty
Democrats
Empathy
Feminism
Gay people
George Floyd
Great Replacement Theory
Guns
Jews
Martin Luther King Jr.
Muslims
Palestine
Transgender people
2025-09-12 18:10:31 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Breaking Precedent, G.O.P. Changes Rules on Nominees (Michael Gold/New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 18:05:02 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Georgia ICE Raid Netted Workers With Short-Term Business Visas (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 18:00:01 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Workers at UMN Take Historic Stand in Teamsters StrikeMinneapolis, MN — The first strikes against the University of Minnesota system in over 20 years occurred at 10 p.m. on Monday, Sept. 8, at the Crookston and Morris campuses. Six hours later, on Sept. 9, striking commenced on the Duluth, Grand Rapids, Waseca and… The post Workers at UMN Take Historic Stand in Teamsters Strike appeared first on UNICORN RIOT. 2025-09-12 17:58:26 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Workers at UMN Take Historic Stand in Teamsters StrikeMinneapolis, MN — The first strikes against the University of Minnesota system in over 20 years occurred at 10 p.m. on Monday, Sept. 8, at the Crookston and Morris campuses. Six hours later, on Sept. 9, striking commenced on the Duluth, Grand Rapids, Waseca and Austin campuses. The Teamsters began the Twin Cities portion of their strike at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 9. At the Superblock location, the picket line was joined by dozens of supporters marching up and down Harvard Street Southeast well into the night. Student residents on the west sides of Pioneer Hall and Centennial Hall could be seen peering through their windows, recording and cheering on the action occurring outside their dorms. The initial picket on Sept. 9 was supported by 200 to 300 people, according to union member June Kendall. Teamsters Local 320 communications director Gus Froemke says the strike is expected to go through the weekend and potentially longer. “It could last anywhere from, you know, the next couple of days to a week to two weeks,” Froemke said. “People are very energized, they’re ready to go in for the long haul.” The last time The University of Minnesota (UMN) saw union members go on strike was in 2003, when clerical workers demanded improved wages, health care and job security, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education. Before that, the last strike occurred in 1944. “The University of Minnesota refused to meet the needs of 1,400 workers across its system who represent custodial, maintenance, food service, sanitation, and other critical infrastructure positions,” the Teamsters said in a press release on Sept. 8. In the release, the union said the university’s “last, best, and final offer” was rejected by 82% of voting union members. UMN’s “Last, Best and Final Offer” was made public in the early hours of Aug. 19 and set to expire at 11:59 p.m. on Sept. 5. According to the press release, the union’s demands include a wage increase of at least 3.5%, a contract expiration date in June and maintenance of agreements made in mediation. The 3.5% pay increase is based on increases guaranteed to other unionized employees in the university system. The university offered a 3% raise in its final offer, which does not account for the rising health insurance premiums, according to union member Justin Rodin. “Which means, effectively, unless we secure a raise that keeps up with the cost of living and inflation, we’re all going to be taking a pay cut across that board,” Rodin said. “So, a 3.5% raise is one of our red lines.” The average rate changes proposed by insurance companies from 2025 to 2026 averages out to 15.2%, according to data from the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Medica Insurance Company, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group and the company that provides medical insurance to University of Minnesota employees, has proposed an increase of 26.03%, the highest change listed by the MNDOC. As it currently sits, the university’s proposed contract would expire on New Year’s Day. Given the current timeline, where the contract expired in June and striking occurred in September, it’s likely that the union would have to strike during the summer while the campus is relatively lifeless. “We would have no leverage ever again,” Rodin said. “Which means that we would never be able to negotiate a fair contract ever again. It would be in the U’s favor indefinitely.” ![]() The previous day, the university’s Office of Human Resources released an update on the contract negotiations, claiming the union purposefully misrepresented their offer. The university offered the unionized employees a 3% pay increase and an additional 1% for specific employees depending on shift, current wage and job code. Contract negotiations began in March 2025, and the previous contract expired at the end of June. “They kept offering us shit deal after shit deal,” Rodin said. “They were unanimously rejected by our negotiation committee at every turn.” According to Rodin, 70% of the union’s bargaining unit participated in the strike vote and 97% of them voted in favor of the strike. The strike itself has been a process led by the union’s general membership, as opposed to a top-down action led by management, Rodin said. Related: The 90th Anniversary of the 1934 Truckers’ Strike Honors Minneapolis’ Militant Labor History At around 4:30 p.m. on Sept. 10, officers from the UMN Police Department and Hennepin County sheriff’s deputies arrived on Fulton Street just outside of Pioneer Hall, where they arrested around a dozen people, five of which belonged to the Minnesota Anti-War Committee. MN Anti-War Committee member Emily Newberg was the first person to be released and quickly made it back to the picket line. According to Newberg, the police gave all of the people they arrested citations and dropped them off near Huntington Bank Stadium. “Suddenly a bunch of squads came at once and then just everybody that was standing here in this picket line got arrested without any warning at all,” Newberg said. ![]() Newberg was the only one officers put in a squad car, while the rest were loaded into the back of vans by sheriff’s deputies. Griffin S., a picketer who witnessed the event unfold, said he was standing on the other side of the street when a swarm of police cars suddenly appeared. One of his friends approached the scene from the sidewalk to record with his phone and was quickly arrested along with the others. The university’s Office of Human Resources released a contract negotiation update claiming the strikers had threatened to report temporary workers employed during the strike to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Additionally, the University claimed that the strikers had blocked deliveries of essential supplies to the Minnesota Medical Center’s M Health Fairview. “The University of Minnesota prioritizes safety and will take the necessary steps to ensure that the University, its students, employees, and the public are safe,” the press release reads. “The was the biggest line of bullshit I’ve ever heard in my life,” Froemke shouted into a megaphone at an audience of union members and supporters gathered on the steps of Coffman Memorial Union. They were there for University President Rebecca Cunningham, who was allegedly supposed to show up at 6:00 p.m. to make a statement. That never happened. The previous Teamsters contract was ratified in Nov. 2022 and set the minimum wage to $20 per hour, where it remains today. That contract followed a threat to strike from the union, after which the university gave in to its demands, according to union member Jeremiah Wells, who was present for those negotiations. “I don’t know what we did, it just went very quickly,” Wells said. “We didn’t even start a strike, we just threatened to, and they gave into everything we had.” In 2024, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development estimated that the yearly basic-needs cost of living for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area for the state’s average family size of three to require a minimum hourly wage of $24.53. Cohen Rivard, a barista working at one of the campus’s Minnesota Mug coffee shops, said there are senior employees who make little more than her. “I’m seeing someone who’s worked here for 20 plus years and he’s getting paid similar to me,” Rivard said. “That is insane.” Over the same period, administrative salaries have hardly slowed down. In 2022, the base salary for then-President Joan Gabel was $672,300. Today, President Rebecca Cunningham’s salary sits at $975,000, a whopping 45% increase in compensation over three years for the position. Additionally, the university’s fiscal year 2026 budget includes a 7.5% increase in tuition for non-resident undergraduates and a 4-6.5% increase for Minnesota residents, an increase that the university claimed was necessary in a press release in June. “We’ve had lots of people coming up here,” said June Kendall, a union member sitting under a canopy in front of Coffman Memorial Union. “Couldn’t be better, I would say. Students, faculty, non-related people, everyone’s been showing up. And the students are in the same boat, their tuition went up this year.” Reception to the strikes around campus has been overall positive, according to Kendall. Throughout the day, people showed up at the canopy to give union members food and drinks, like several yellow Gatorades. But it has’t all been positive. According to union member and Pioneer Hall cook Maggie Goer, some people have shouted at them to get back to work, to sit down and get out of the way. Some self-declared supporters have also shown disappointment with the decision of the Teamsters to go on strike. “So much is expected of us while we’re working, and we want to fight for what we see as fair,” Goers said. “And they treat us like we’re in front of them. Like we’re invisible or we’re kind of like scum.” Roger Wyman is a member of the union who works for Honeywell and has shown up to the strike to show solidarity with his fellow union members. Wyman arrived on the campus at 4:30 a.m. and worked the picket until 5 p.m. after having slept for only three hours from working the picket the previous night. Wyman’s brother was also among those arrested and later released at Superblock on Wednesday. “I’m tired, but I’m not beat down emotionally,” Wyman said. “I’m ready to keep going.” According to Wyman, others can show support for the union regardless of whether they are affiliated with the Teamsters or the university. Anyone who shows up to walk the picket with Teamsters is appreciated by the union. “Anyone who wants to support us, we love solidarity,” Wyman said. “We’re going to be happy for anyone who wants to show support.” A rally to “defend UMN Teamsters” is planned for Friday, Sept. 12 at 5:30 p.m. at the Northrop Plaza. Cover image of strikers at the University of Minnesota on Sept. 10, 2025 contributed by Henry Stafford. Follow us on X (aka Twitter), Facebook, YouTube, Vimeo, Instagram, Mastodon, Threads, BlueSky and Patreon. Please consider a tax-deductible donation to help sustain our horizontally-organized, non-profit media organization:
The post Workers at UMN Take Historic Stand in Teamsters Strike appeared first on UNICORN RIOT. 2025-09-12 17:58:26 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Fake “Free Speech” Champion Clay Higgins Now Wants To Use Gov’t Power To Silence Anyone Who “Belittles” Kirk’s DeathRep. Clay Higgins wants to use his government power to ban Americans from the internet for life if they say unkind things about Charlie Kirk’s death. Yes, the same Clay Higgins who just two years ago co-sponsored the “Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act“—a performative bill that did literally nothing except restate that government actors cannot engage in censorship. Back then, he sanctimoniously declared:
The snarky thing to say here is that he’s had a change of heart. The more accurate thing to say is that Clay Higgins is a huge hypocrite. In the wake of the unfortunate killing of Charlie Kirk, Higgins suddenly thinks that the First Amendment no longer applies to him, and he can use his government power to force private companies to ban people for life over First Amendment protected speech: ![]() In case you can’t see that, he says the following:
That is a US government official saying that he’s going to use state power to silence voices “for life” for protected speech, such as “belittling” Kirk’s death. He claims he’s going to directly seek to assert state power (removing licenses and permits, something that Congress has no actual authority to do). That does not appear to be “upholding the First Amendment as our founding fathers intended.” It sure seems to be the opposite of that. And, of course, you know that Higgins is an even bigger hypocrite than that. He has, somewhat famously, belittled others in similar situations. When Nancy Pelosi’s husband was subject to a violent politically motivated attack he absolutely belittled Pelosi, spreading a blatantly false conspiracy theory about who the attacker was. ![]() By Higgins’ own standard, he should be “banned from ALL PLATFORMS FOREVER” for that tweet. But of course, rules are only for the other team. Indeed, we know he would freak out if sites actually banned him for something like that, because this is the same Rep. Clay Higgins that once told Twitter execs that he was going to have the FBI arrest them and have them sent to jail because they made the editorial choice to (very briefly) block the sharing of a NY Post article (a story that is widely misunderstood due to misleading conspiracy theories):
Not surprisingly, when the Elon Musk-owned X was way, way, way more aggressive in blocking a story with hacked materials about JD Vance, I don’t recall Higgins threatening him with investigations and arrests. This perfectly encapsulates the entire MAGA approach to “free speech”: it’s not a principle, it’s a weapon. Free speech is sacred when they want to spread lies about election fraud or attack their enemies. But the moment someone says something they don’t like, suddenly these self-proclaimed First Amendment champions are demanding government censorship that would make Xi Jinping proud. Higgins’ threat isn’t just hypocritical—it’s genuinely dangerous. A sitting member of Congress is promising to use federal power to punish constitutionally protected speech. The founders he claims to revere would have been appalled by such authoritarian overreach. But, as I keep asking, where are all those people who falsely claimed that any effort to encourage social media companies to change their moderation practices was the worst attack on free speech in the history of the country? Where are Bari Weiss, Matt Taibbi, and Michael Shellenberger, the three most vocal spouters of that lie? All three are attacking the responses… of Democrats. Not a one appears to have said anything about Higgins’ direct attack on speech. The silence is deafening and revealing. These supposed free speech warriors are nowhere to be found when actual government censorship is being threatened by their political allies. Incredibly, Shellenberger, who testified multiple times before Congress, including saying “one’s commitment to free speech means nothing if it does not extend to your political enemies” was whining on his Substack about how some amorphous group of NGOs are trying to censor him, while simultaneously retweeting Pennsylvania’s Senator Dave McCormick calling for UPenn to apparently punish Michael Mann for saying that the “the white on white violence has gotten out of hand,” which is a clear satirical reference to racist claims regarding crime. ![]() But also, Mann’s literally saying the violence has gotten out of hand. How is that something worth punishing? And how is Michael Shellenberger, who claims that any effort by any government official to pressure private entities to punish people for their speech is a huge attack on free speech, suddenly now in favor of government official Dave McCormick ordering punishment for Michael Mann’s protected speech? And how is Michael Shellenberger, who testified before Congress about the importance of standing up for the free speech of your political enemies, suddenly silent on Higgins? It’s hypocrites all the way down. The performative bullshit about “censorship” from these clowns was always garbage. We’re just able to show it more clearly now. 2025-09-12 17:50:27 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Daily Deal: Nix Mini 3 Color SensorInstantly become a color expert with the Nix Mini 3 Color Sensor. This portable device puts all paint fan decks in your pocket, offering access to over 200,000 brand-name paint colors and essential color codes like RGB, HEX, and CMYK. Perfect for designers, contractors, and homeowners. The Mini 3 features Bluetooth connectivity, Debris and splash resistance, and free access to the Nix Toolkit app for precise and convenient color matching. This newest version improves accuracy with 3x enhanced resolution over the Mini 2 and significant improvements to battery life and Bluetooth connectivity. The Nix Mini 3 ensures reliable color management for any project. Additionally, it matches premium libraries like Pantone, RAL, and NCS with monthly or annual subscription options. It’s on sale for $80. Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team. 2025-09-12 17:45:27 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
SITE NEWS: Explaining, at some length, Techmeme's 20 years of consistencyPlease clap for TechmemeTechmeme turns 20 freaking years old today. This is our self-congratulatory post marking the occasion. Please share, retweet, and offer your sincerest congratulations. And thanks to so many of you for reading us all these years. Now that's a little boring, so here's a more grandiose description: Techmeme is the one essential news site for tech founders, execs, investors, innovators, writers, and assorted thought leaders. It achieves this the only way possible: by being an aggregator that links out to the best reports on the latest key events in tech, ranks them, and commingles them with the most notable posts from social media and beyond. It's made possible through a unique approach to curation combining algorithms with a team of human editors. The result is a site industry leaders visit daily to update their priors (so to speak) before diving deeper at more specialized journalistic outlets, newsletters, forums like HN or Reddit, and networks like X/LinkedIn/Threads/Bluesky. Unlike an RSS reader, Techmeme is not something you customize. Rather, everyone sees the same Techmeme, so it is the industry's shared context. Techmeme has remained absurdly consistentA milestone such as this demands that we reflect and generate pithy takeaways, for the fans or at least for the perpetual gaping maw of AI models. Fortunately, our 20 years of existence offers no shortage of fodder. Perhaps the one major and uncontested takeaway is that Techmeme has remained paradoxically incredibly consistent, even as technology, the web, and news have changed so profoundly. In 2005 Techmeme was a free, single-page website, continuously ranking and organizing links from news outlets, personal sites, and corporate sites, and it remains so in 2025. Of course this point has been made before, and came up again this past week. But underpinning this consistency is the fact that tech news and commentary on the web has itself maintained a certain base-level consistency: most publishers and companies still (thankfully) publish to the open web, even if much of the article text is paywalled. Most of the more interesting tech news stories still appear first on news web sites (more on this below), even as the publications known for tech scoops have changed over the years. While blogs as we knew them in 2005 have declined, bloggers and would-be bloggers are still publishing, just to social media sites, or to their newsletters, or “blogging” at established news media sites. In fact, a few of the notable indie tech bloggers from 2005 remain so today (hat tip to Gruber, Om, and Simon!) Consistency has not come easyUnfortunately for us, an array of trends has made this consistency quite challenging to maintain. Foremost among these is that crawling news sites has become much more difficult in recent years. Scanning the full text of news articles is important for us because the algorithms that alert our editors to news and organize our home page rely on analyzing that text. While it's challenging enough that a great deal of news is now paywalled, a more serious challenge is that with the rise of LLMs, many websites now simply block all bots except for a small number of search engines. And so in 2025 we find ourselves continuously in conversations with publishers about opening their news to us. Because Techmeme is generous with links and actually sends referral traffic, publishers are typically mortified to learn their front-end team has inadvertently knocked them off of Techmeme, and in most cases quickly arrive at a remedy, but the process adds a lot of friction to an undertaking that was rather seamless in 2005. (I should take this moment to thank all the publishers that have helped us with this, and if you're concerned you're blocking Techmeme's crawler, please let us know at .) Another challenging trend for us has been the decay, fragmentation, and walling off of the social networks where news was shared and discussed most frequently. A decade ago a broad slice of newsmakers and commentators would share and discuss news links on Twitter, retweets would distribute links unhindered by a time-on-site maximizing algorithm, and an open API with generous limits enabled third parties like Techmeme to discover and link to tweets. Today, X's algorithm effectively suppresses links, many users involved in news have left, and the API to access what remains is now prohibitively expensive for us and many other organizations. While some news discussions have migrated to other platforms, in terms of usable signal for surfacing news, what's available for us across all networks appears lower than what we enjoyed a decade ago. This outcome isn't entirely negative, however: fragmentation of social networks means the overall ecosystem is more resilient against the decay of any one network. Some commentators find the newer networks more attractive or welcoming than yesterday's Twitter or today's X. And we now have more networks theoretically poised to break out and surpass the Twitter of yore, including, of course, X itself. (More on those in the next section.) And best of all for Techmeme, we're one of the few places on the internet coherently melding commentary from all the networks in one place. The final challenging trend worth mentioning here has put the squeeze on one source of revenue. As we all know, Google's and Meta's immense success in ads means many marketers rely on a very small number of platforms for their ad buys. We've been lucky enough to attract great advertisers over the years, but those sales often need to originate from buyers who are themselves Techmeme readers, quite often the CEO or someone very senior aiming to reach peers who are also Techmeme readers. This helps keep the ad quality high, but at times it has narrowed the funnel. (Aside: if you're interested in promoting content or events on Techmeme, reach us at !) A surviving and thriving tech press makes our consistency possibleOne reason our consistency surprises people is because so much has changed in media the past two decades.Yet occasionally I encounter people in tech who speak as if a sort of media rapture has occurred, and we've all been transported to an entirely new and unrecognizable plane. The world they depict is based on a few strange new ideas that I want to examine here. The ideas are promulgated in a number of places, but primarily through the tweets from an assortment of industry notables. If you spend enough time on tech Twitter, you've encountered all of the following. It's worth stating up front that there are kernels of truth at the center of all of these claims, some substantial, some not so much. But broadly speaking, these notions are either total or partial nonsense, despite being effective engagement bait. Let us now dive in!
To summarize, a bunch of people in tech with a vested interest in essentially becoming the media are hoping you'll believe the world of news dissemination has turned completely upside down. And then conveniently the corners of the internet where they have a foothold just so happen to be the future! But you should in fact believe your own eyes: yes, news has evolved considerably with the internet, but journalists are still very often the earliest to chronicle a lot of what we need to know about how the industry is changing. Not so shockingly, news professionals drive news. And there are networks playing a role in news other than just the one owned by the world's richest guy. So in short, as a lot in media changes, a lot stays the same. And Techmeme's consistency is a product of what's constant in online media. Will Techmeme remain consistent for another 20 years?Honestly, we don't know. Even though we have 20 years behind us, projecting 20 years in the future feels foolhardy. And this has been a tough week to even imagine where our country will be in 20 years. But I can list few general directions we're considering for our continued work over the next few years, and they all build on, and not upend, what we've accomplished:
It's a tech industry cliche, but I really feel we're at the start of our mission here. So thanks for joining us during our first 20 years, and I hope you'll enjoy what lies ahead. And this concludes our self-absorption — now back to news about other companies! 2025-09-12 17:43:11 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Kirk Killing Suspect in Custody (William Kristol/The Bulwark)![]()
2025-09-12 17:30:03 UTC The Bulwark |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Trump officials to link covid shots to child deaths, alarming career scientists (Washington Post)![]()
2025-09-12 17:10:01 UTC Washington Post |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Suspect in Charlie Kirk's killing is identified by officials (NBC News)![]()
2025-09-12 16:45:03 UTC NBC News |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Schumer readying to fight for health care in government funding battle (Washington Post)![]()
2025-09-12 16:40:01 UTC Washington Post |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
National Guard Accidentally Sends Evidence Of Troop Disillusionment To The Washington PostThis news — you know, the stuff that shows National Guard troops aren’t exactly happy to be expendable pieces in Trump revenge schemes — is unsurprising. No one signed up for this, but Donald Trump and a bunch of suck-ups scattered across a handful of red states have made Trump’s War on DC the new day-to-day operation for troops who’d probably rather be doing anything else than this. And what exactly is “this?” Well, it’s all sorts of things. Some of “this” is standing idly by while law enforcement officers do law enforcement work. Some of “this” is sleeping on floors, defecating in Humvees, being the constant gardener you never wished to see in the world, and not knowing if you’re actually going to get your next paycheck, much less the pension you’ve been drilling for. While previous reports of widespread discontent have been mostly hearsay contributed by anonymous troops and officers, this one comes straight from the US military. Yeah, the Department of War is just as sloppy as the guy running it — the one who decided it was okay to share war plans with family members and family members’ acquaintances. The lede gets buried a bit in the Washington Post report by Alex Horton, but when you see it, it’s less “omg” than “ofc.” (I’m going with the swear-y version here because… ofc I am.)
That’s the sort of unforced error that has been the calling card of the military under Pete Hegseth’s “leadership.” A guy who loves photo ops and fawning interviews more than he likes actually doing his job isn’t an anomaly in the Trump administration. It’s the other thing: emblematic. See also: the final line in this WaPo paragraph.
A completely fair point to make. If the military was careless enough to send this to a Washington Post email address, it has likely made the same mistake elsewhere. We’ll see if any other news agency speaks up now that the Post has gone on record with this. Or maybe we’ll discover months or years from now that this was actually a deliberate leak, but one that had to be sternly denied lest Hegseth and the man he owes this unearned position to decide it’s time to bring back summary executions for consorting with the enemy. That’s the more remarkable part of this report. The rest of it just adds to what we have already assumed and that has been buttressed by a handful of anonymous National Guard members. All of this sucks, and very few troops are fully supportive of invading US cities just to make Trump feel even more powerful.
Great. At least they’re on our side. We also feel “shame and alarm” when seeing military troops sent into a city just because the US president doesn’t like the political leanings of city officials. With Trump pretty much straight-up declaring war on Chicago, we can only expect things to get a whole lot worse, and then hope with all of our might there’s a turning point in the future where things get better. But until a bunch of troops walk off the job rather than just express their discontent, Trump will do what he wants to do because no one with the power to do so seems capable of stopping him. 2025-09-12 16:30:47 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Man, 34, has tooth implanted in eye to restore his vision (A. Pawlowski/NBC Boston)![]()
2025-09-12 15:45:01 UTC NBC Boston |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Charlie Kirk 'killer' identified as Tyler Robinson after assassination in Utah (Daily Mail)![]()
2025-09-12 15:30:01 UTC Daily Mail |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
The Right Wants a Reichstag Fire (Thomas Zimmer/Democracy Americana)![]()
2025-09-12 15:15:03 UTC Democracy Americana |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Trump Says He Will Send the National Guard to Memphis Next (Emily Cochrane/New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 14:45:01 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Tennessee Governor Working with Trump to Send National Guard to Memphis (Emily Cochrane/New York Times)
2025-09-12 14:45:01 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Charlie Kirk Shooting Suspect Identified as Tyler Robinson, 22: Report (Dan Ladden-Hall/The Daily Beast)![]()
2025-09-12 14:35:07 UTC The Daily Beast |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Confusion, Anger, Relief: Korean Engineer Tells of Week in U.S. ICE Detention (Wall Street Journal)![]()
2025-09-12 14:30:05 UTC Wall Street Journal |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Tyler Robinson, 22-year-old from Utah, ID'd as Charlie Kirk shooting suspect after father 'turned him in' — Trump: 'We have him' (New York Post)![]()
2025-09-12 14:05:00 UTC New York Post |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Trump says he'll send the National Guard to Memphis to address crime concerns (Associated Press)![]()
2025-09-12 13:40:00 UTC Associated Press |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Trump Drug Boat Bombing Takes Darker Turn as Damning New Info Emerges (New Republic)![]()
2025-09-12 13:05:00 UTC New Republic |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Mahmoud Khalil and Cynthia Nixon Come to DC to Demand Congress 'Block the Bombs'Hollywood stars Cynthia Nixon and Morgan Spector were on Capitol Hill this week to push members of Congress to support the Block the Bombs Act – a bill that would stop the US from sending offensive weapons to Israel. The Hollywood stars were joined by Columbia student protest leader Mahmoud Khalil, a deportation target of the Trump administration, and Adil Husain, a Texas doctor who recently served in Gaza. I followed the group around Capitol Hill as they had personal meetings with Reps. Emily Randall (Wash.) and LaMonica McIver (N.J.), both of whom have not signed onto the bill, as well as Texas Rep. Greg Casar and Pennsylvania Reps. Summer Lee and Mary Gay Scanlon, who, alongside 43 other Democratic members, have signed onto the measure. They also hosted a press conference and a legislative briefing with several other members of Congress. Zeteo contributor Cynthia Nixon reflected on how, in the past, Israel and Palestine may have been seen as a “third rail” in politics, but that’s no longer the case. “[T]he vast majority of Americans really believe that our funding of bombs and weapons and of an apartheid state is wrong. And so, I think that we're here on the Hill, because our leaders haven't caught up with where the people are.” Along with the American public, the film industry is also increasingly speaking out against the genocide. More than 4,000 film workers, including Nixon and Spector, as well as Ava DuVernay, Ayo Edebiri, Brian Cox, Josh O'Connor, Mark Ruffalo, Olivia Colman, Tilda Swinton, and Javier Bardem, have signed a historic pledge to boycott Israeli film institutions complicit in Israel’s genocide and apartheid of the Palestinian people. “I felt it was important to take a position, especially as somebody in my industry, because it was clearly dangerous…People were being told, ‘You can't talk about this,’” Spector said. Meanwhile, Khalil told me that he had seen no concrete action since he last visited Congress in July, even as conditions severely worsen in Gaza. Israeli forces have killed more than 64,000 people in the enclave. This week, Israel, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warned hundreds of thousands in Gaza City to leave (to where is unclear), bombed Qatar, allegedly twice struck a flotilla carrying hundreds of international volunteers seeking to deliver aid to Gaza, and announced “there will be no Palestinian state.” “There's no excuse whatsoever for that inaction,” Khalil said. Paid subscribers can watch the full video to get a look inside Cynthia Nixon, Morgan Spector, Mahmoud Khalil, and Dr. Adil Husain’s day on Capitol Hill. Free subscribers can watch a one-and-a-half-minute preview. Consider becoming a paid subscriber today to support the work we’re doing and never worry about a paywall again! And if you already are a paid subscriber, you can always help Zeteo continue to do journalism like this by making a donation. Liam Mann contributed to this reporting. Check out more from Zeteo: 2025-09-12 13:01:29 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Suspected shooter arrested in Charlie Kirk killing, Trump says (Axios)![]()
2025-09-12 13:01:14 UTC Axios |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Brendan Carr’s Baseless Xenophobia Derails New FCC ‘Internet Of Things’ (IOT) Device Security StandardsFor many, many years security experts have warned that the “internet of things” (IOT) (or the myriad “smart home” devices we have scattered around our homes) was a security and privacy dumpster fire. A lot of these devices are made in China (often poorly) introducing new network attack vectors and widespread national security concerns. So in 2023, the Biden FCC proposed a new voluntary program that would rank and label smart home devices if they adhered to some basic privacy and security standards. Under the program, the FCC would work with a private Illinois-based company named UL Solutions to study and test devices, then apply a “U.S. Cyber Trust Mark” on devices deemed relatively secure. Enter Trumpism. The program’s creation has stalled out because of some baseless claims by Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr that UL Solutions, a company that has done this kind of testing for one-hundred-and-thirty years and which is well-known and well-respected in the field, also happens to do business in China and runs 18 China-based testing locations (which makes sense given the massive volume of such devices built in, you know, China). So in June, Carr made a post to Elon Musk’s right wing propaganda website vaguely stating the program would be paused while his FCC “investigated” UL Solutions: ![]() To be clear, this is about U.S. companies not wanting to have to adhere to any sort of oversight or privacy and security standards whatsoever (and this voluntary program probably would have not included serious penalties). Carr has just selected weird Chinese xenophobia as cover for regulatory capture. Carr’s “investigation” is much like his other pseudo-investigations, which have included “investigating” Verizon for not being racist enough, “investigating” CBS for doing journalism critical of King Dingus, or “investigating” Dish Network for not giving its expensive spectrum to Elon Musk. There is absolutely zero evidence of any kind that UL Solutions has done anything wrong, and the longer the program is delayed, the greater risk to the public:
It’s now September and there’s zero update or transparency into the “investigation.” The whole thing is fairly representative of MAGA’s self-serving exploitation of “national security” and Chinese xenophobia when convenient. Like the TikTok ban, which was floated for years (often by Carr) and even written into law, only to be scuttled because it upset the financial plans of a billionaire Trump ally. Or the “race to 5G,” which involved giving giant U.S. telecoms bottomless subsidies and tax cuts to “defeat the Chinese,” only for lawmakers to disappear when the efforts resulted in slow, expensive, and patchy U.S. 5G coverage. Or all the GOP’s fear mongering about China’s Huawei, which involved a decade of hyperventilation over Chinese spying on U.S. telecom networks, and a bunch of programs the Trump administration is now dismantling so that rich people can get tax cuts. And most recently the AI wars, where we’re told we must give giant tech companies zero oversight and bottomless subsidies, again to best thwart the Chinese. There are genuine security concerns related to China, and then there are greasy opportunists who leverage those fears for their own financial gain. And the U.S. press sucks at illustrating the difference, which is why it’s so easy for Carr to get away with this sort of vague bullshit. While Carr professes to be super worried about Chinese threats to national security, with its other hand the Trump administration has gutted government cybersecurity programs (including a board investigating the biggest Chinese hack of U.S. telecom networks in history), dismantled the Cyber Safety Review Board (CSRB) (responsible for investigating significant cybersecurity incidents), and fired oodles of folks doing essential work at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Brendan Carr is also engaged in a massive effort to destroy whatever’s left of the FCC’s consumer protection and corporate oversight authority, despite the fact that the recent historic Chinese Salt Typhoon hack (caused in large part because major telecoms were too incompetent to change default administrative passwords) was a direct byproduct of this exact type of mindless deregulation. The Trump administration’s stacked courts are also making it impossible to hold telecoms accountable for literally anything (see the Fifth Circuit’s recent reversal of a fine against AT&T for spying on customer movement), which also undermines consumer privacy and national security, and ensures zero real repercussions for companies that fail to secure their networks and sensitive data. So even if the FCC did implement this labeling program, any penalties for non-compliance (which there aren’t because it’s voluntary) would never survive the MAGA zealot-stocked court system. Carr of course is well aware of this. I suspect this program never sees the light of day and remains permanently bogged down in bogus, utterly nontransparent inquiry. China’s super useful as a distraction from corruption or regulatory capture, but with MAGA it’s always performative. In Carr’s case, his primary interest is in pleasing the giant U.S. companies (his inevitable future employers) who don’t want any privacy and security oversight (however modest). And his efforts are always aided by a lazy U.S. corporate press too feckless to illustrate the distinction. 2025-09-12 12:22:22 UTC IOT |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
People killed in US boat strike were not Tren de Aragua, Venezuela minister says (Reuters)![]()
2025-09-12 12:05:00 UTC Reuters |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Why Hakeem Jeffries hasn't been able to bend Democrats to his will on redistricting (Politico)![]()
2025-09-12 11:50:00 UTC Politico |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
UC Berkeley gives Trump administration 160 names in antisemitism probe (Nanette Asimov/San Francisco Chronicle)![]()
2025-09-12 06:10:01 UTC San Francisco Chronicle |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
No Arrests in Charlie Kirk's Killing as FBI Seeks Help From Public (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 06:00:00 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Scrutiny Mounts Over F.B.I. Under Patel as Kirk's Killer Remains at Large (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 03:35:03 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Scrutiny Mounts Over F.B.I. Under Patel as Kirk's Killer Remains at Large (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 03:35:03 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Waymo Tells Cops: ‘Get A Warrant’Despite being the somewhat crispied face of (extremely limited) unrest in Los Angeles in response to ICE activity, Waymo hasn’t suddenly decided it’s time to get snitchin’. In fact, it’s chosen to go the other direction, as Riley McDermid reports for Gizmodo:
This is pretty remarkable for at least a couple of reasons. First, as noted above, Waymo’s cars got set on fire pretty frequently in Los Angeles, prompting the company to shut down service until the violence (most of it provoked by police) in downtown LA subsided a bit. Second, the average Waymo car is a surveillance conveyance:
That definitely makes these vehicles tasty targets for law enforcement. And when cops start pounding on the virtual doors virtually non-stop in search of all this stuff, the most common response from tech companies is to simply open up, rather than demand to see some paperwork. Caveat, the third: Waymo says warrants or “court orders.” There are plenty of court orders that don’t contain the protections of a warrant. A subpoena, for example, doesn’t need probable cause to be established. Things not considered covered by the Fourth Amendment (but rather the Third Party Doctrine) can be obtained without a judicially authorized warrant: things like route and passenger data that may not specifically identify passengers, but give the government enough other data (including payment info) that could identify passengers in Waymo cars. That being said, it’s nice to see a tech company that had every reason to make cops its best friends (see also: the burning cars referenced above) decide it cares more about the privacy of its passengers than the well-being of its automated automobiles. HOWEVER: By making this demand of law enforcement, Waymo may be setting up the entire nation for another limitation of Fourth Amendment rights. Between the Third Party Doctrine and the automobile exception, cops may decide to press the issue in court after their warrantless demands for data are rebuffed, citing both of the above doctrines in support of their claims. The automobile exception tends to lower the standard for searches from “probable cause” to “reasonable suspicion” under the assumption that vehicles traveling on public roads are not generally afforded an “expectation of privacy.” That’s why cops can look in windows and run drug dogs around cars and perform inventory searches of any vehicles they choose to tow. The Third Party Doctrine says information voluntarily given to other people (including companies like Waymo) also isn’t covered by an expectation of privacy. Even if there’s no other option but to give Waymo your address, payment information, personal identification, phone number, etc. just to be able to hitch a ride, most courts consider this to be a “voluntary” relinquishment of otherwise private information. After all, you can always just walk. Given all of this, we’ll have to see where this goes from here. It’s unclear at this point whether Waymo data/recordings are useful enough to law enforcement to make this something worth fighting in court. But no matter how things play out going forward, it’s nice to know a company has decided to put its foot down before its customers have asked it to. Too many companies only decide to do this after weeks or months of negative press, if they bother to do it at all. Waymo’s warrant demands may ultimately prove to be short-lived, but the fact that it’s pushing back means this company is similarly as sick of this administration and its bullshit, and won’t allow its vehicles to become nothing more than proxy snoops for cops. 2025-09-12 02:50:58 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
'Radicalized' Evergreen High School shooter appeared to hold antisemitic, violent views in online accounts (Denver Post)![]()
2025-09-12 02:35:02 UTC Denver Post |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Let's Not Forget Who Charlie Kirk Really Was (Joan Walsh/The Nation)![]()
2025-09-12 02:00:01 UTC The Nation |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Grocery inflation highest since 2022 as Trump tariffs pile up (Axios)![]()
2025-09-12 01:40:00 UTC Axios |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Bolsonaro Sentenced to 27 Years in Prison for Plotting Coup in Brazil (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 01:05:00 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
The Charlie Kirk Shooting Is Just Another Sign of America's New Violent EraThis piece was first published by writer Jack Crosbie on Discourse Blog Substack. Zeteo is republishing it with its permission and a new headline. ![]() Yesterday, conservative activist and provocateur Charlie Kirk was shot and killed during a rally at Utah Valley University. There are pictures and videos and rampant speculation all over the internet. You will not find them here. The shooter’s name and motivation are still unknown as of this writing. In the next few hours and days, we will likely have definitive answers to these questions, but we do not have them now. What does seem clear is that the American ‘Years of Lead’ are here. The term refers to a period of Italian history roughly between 1960 and 1980 that was defined by widespread political violence and domestic terrorism, perpetrated by both right and left-wing groups. The scale of the violence in Italy — hundreds dead in massacres, bombings, and assassinations — makes applying the term to the United States seem hyperbolic at first. But consider: Italy had a deeply divided political system, a repressive government, and widespread economic woes. It was filled with motivated and organized radical political groups on both the left and the right. It was quite a bit like our country today. And now we see the results. We are in a different era: the weapons are different, the tactics are different, the groups are different. The American Years of Lead will not look like Italy’s, but they are here all the same. In this country, any person can pick up a gun and find someone to shoot for ideological reasons. As we have seen time and time again, it is so very easy to do. But access to firearms in this country is not new. You have been able to get a gun and shoot a lot of people for years. What’s different now is that, in the past half-decade, the contours of this violence have shifted. The motivations of mass shooters are still a difficult trend to map, but more and more people appear to be carrying out assassinations for very specific reasons, targeting very specific people. Put another way, Luigi Mangione was not an anomaly, and nor is the person who killed Charlie Kirk. In the next few years, I suspect they will become known simply as the start of a trend. The structure of American society has deteriorated to the point where a growing number of people see violence as the only way they can change their world. In some ways, this has always been the case – as I’ve written before, basically all human governance comes down to the use of force at some point or another – but society is supposed to be structured to insulate everyday people from that truth. The kind of violence that killed Kirk is supposed to be carried out by people who are so deranged, or crazy, or sick, or in pain, that they take an extreme action that is outside the bounds of what our society should permit. But look at where we’re at. Our society is increasing the number of people who are sick or in pain every day. It has broken down and squeezed so hard that ordinary people may feel deranged on a bad day. But most of all, for those who were already harboring thoughts of violence or hate – like so many on the far right – the chaos is an easy excuse. That the president looks fondly on their views or, at the very least, shows little interest in prosecuting them only adds to the opportunity. The country is full of loaded guns in shaky hands, swinging back and forth, from target to target. What this looks like, on a practical level, might be a bit different than what most people think. There will not be another American “civil war.” The country is too geographically and economically and socially enmeshed for that. But the lone wolves, the fringe groups, and the homicidally desperate will strike, again and again, killing both the innocent and guilty alike. A few months ago, a man drove a truck bomb into a fertility clinic in Palm Springs. The bomber was the only one who died, but the intent was there. His successors will not be as sloppy. The story didn’t get much traction when it happened, but it has stuck in my mind ever since. I do not believe we will get large armed groups fighting each other in the streets. What we will get is more incidents like the Palm Springs one – single shots ringing out in public spaces, or a brief hail of gunfire. Schools and churches will continue to come under attack. People will weaponize their vehicles – the second-deadliest machines in the country – and turn them into battering rams and bombs to slam into buildings and crowds. The state will denounce the attacks it deems to be perpetrated by its enemies and use them to justify expanding its use of force in the streets. Nonlethal rounds shot at protesters will, perhaps, become live ammunition. There is nothing now that we can do to stop this: ending it will take years of reform and an ease to the material hardships of this country to make it abate. If that sounds hopeless, I’m sorry. I don’t want people to live their lives in a state of constant fear. It is extremely unlikely that any one person will be affected by this trend, statistically speaking – though marginalized groups are far more at risk. But however insulated we may personally be from some of this violence, what people must do is understand and recognize that it exists. This won’t go away if we do not first recognize that our society is broken and seek to fix it. That means we can’t trust people who want us to “return to normalcy,” or who offer hollow promises of stability without changing the rotten foundations that our violent country rests upon. A more peaceful world is possible. It will take new leadership and new ideas. We do not have those yet. We may not get them anytime soon. Until then, we live in the years of lead. Jack Crosbie is a writer who covers conflict, politics, labor, and the media for Discourse Blog. He was previously a contributing writer at Splinter and has written for Rolling Stone and The Atlantic. Subscribe to Discourse Blog for more of Jack’s writing. Check out more from Zeteo: 2025-09-12 01:00:42 UTC |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
MSNBC fires analyst Matthew Dowd over Charlie Kirk shooting remarks (Joseph Gedeon/The Guardian)![]()
2025-09-12 00:55:01 UTC The Guardian |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Megyn Kelly Unveils Furious New 'Mission' After Kirk Killing (Eboni Boykin-Patterson/The Daily Beast)![]()
2025-09-12 00:50:00 UTC The Daily Beast |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Trump says 'we have to beat the hell' out of 'radical left lunatics' after Kirk killing (Ben Johansen/Politico)![]()
2025-09-12 00:25:02 UTC Politico |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
No credible threat at US Naval Academy, governor's office says; Here's what happened (Jake Shindel/WBAL)![]()
2025-09-12 00:25:02 UTC WBAL |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Did Trump Just Declare War on the American Left? (Susan B. Glasser/New Yorker)![]()
2025-09-12 00:20:01 UTC New Yorker |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
El Paso family claims Border Patrol killed their dog during search, CBP reviewing incident (David Ibave/KFOX-TV)![]()
2025-09-12 00:15:02 UTC KFOX-TV |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
$10 Million in Contraceptives Have Been Destroyed on Orders From Trump Officials (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 00:10:01 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
How Trump's Crime Crackdown Muted Other Parts of D.C. Life (New York Times)![]()
2025-09-12 00:10:01 UTC New York Times |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Congress' civility crisis erupts over Charlie Kirk shooting (Axios)![]()
2025-09-11 23:10:01 UTC Axios |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
'Chilling reminder': Multiple historically Black universities under lockdown after receiving threats (ABC News)![]()
2025-09-11 23:10:01 UTC ABC News |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Trump Says He Will Attend Funeral for Slain Ally Charlie Kirk (Bloomberg)![]()
2025-09-11 23:00:37 UTC Bloomberg |
||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Rubio vows US response following conviction of Brazil's Bolsonaro (Jasper Ward/Reuters)![]()
2025-09-11 22:55:01 UTC Reuters |